We publish our audit record because accuracy claims should be checkable. Every entry on this site runs through an automated fact-audit pipeline (accuracy audit → source-grounded repair → visual QA); this page is generated from that pipeline's own report, not written by hand.
Last full accuracy audit: 2026-08-27 · 5 entries checked · 2 flagged · 9 issues confirmed · 2 corrected · 7 still open
Ginseng — The entry states 'South China ginseng (P. notoginseng)' but P. notoginseng is not commonly known as 'South China ginseng' in standard English; it is known as Sanqi or notoginseng.
Ginseng — The entry claims 'there is no clinical evidence that it has any therapeutic effects,' which is factually incorrect because clinical evidence exists for some effects (e.g., cognitive function, immune response, fatigue), even if mixed.
Lavandula — The entry states 'genus of 47 known species' but the cited modern classification (Upson and Andrews, 2004) recognizes 39 species, making the number 47 unsupported.
Lavandula — The claim that the genus's native range extends to the Indian subcontinent is inaccurate for the genus as a whole; only a few species occur there, not the entire genus.
Flax — [staleness sweep] contains time-sensitive marker (as of 2022) - verify against current source and re-date or remove
Liquorice — [staleness sweep] contains time-sensitive marker (as of 2017) - verify against current source and re-date or remove
All content is fetchable as JSON at /data/content/ · llms.txt · sitemap
Spotted an error? Suggest an edit — reader reports go straight into the audit queue.